Cases 21 - 30 of 501
Morris v. Harris
as 1:2022cv03899
Plaintiff:
Teimel Morris
Respondent:
Superintendent David R Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noor v. Hussain NH et al
as 1:2022cv03711
Plaintiff:
Ayesha Noor NH
Defendant:
Ahmed Hussain NH, Nasreej Taj, Perveez Hussain NH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lopez v. Lilley
as 1:2022cv03526
Petitioner:
Adrian Lopez
Respondent:
Superintendent Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernazard v. Miller
as 1:2022cv03176
Petitioner:
Jose Bernazard
Respondent:
Superintendent Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cohen v. Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv02553
Petitioner:
Darryl Cohen
Respondent:
Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pace v. Miller
as 1:2022cv02365
Petitioner:
Willie Pace
Respondent:
Superintendent Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Miller
as 2:2022cv01402
Petitioner:
Noel Hicks
Respondent:
Superintendent Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Wolcott
as 1:2022cv01344
Petitioner:
Shamduh Wilson
Respondent:
Superintendent Julie Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Miller
as 1:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Jerome Smith
Respondent:
Superintendent Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carillo v. Superintendent of Greenhaven Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv00206
Petitioner:
Martin Carillo
Respondent:
Superintendent of Greenhaven Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
