Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Nelson et al v. Galil Management et al
as 1:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Johanna Nelson, Maureen Nelson and Tamara Nelson
Defendant:
Galil Management, GFB Management and Plaza Apartments LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05136
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bethea v. DeBlasio et al
as 1:2017cv04828
Defendant:
Robin Beaulieu, William DeBlasio, NYC Department of Corrections Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bethea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez et al v. Deutsche Bank AG et al
as 1:2017cv02474
Plaintiff:
J. A., L. A., A.A. and others
Defendant:
Bank Saderat PLC, Barclays Bank PLC, Commerzbank AG and others
Unknown:
Mark A. Beatty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01736
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
