Cases 61 - 70 of 10,703
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 173.56.18.126
as 1:2024cv03066
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 173.56.18.126
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 72.229.230.25
as 1:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 72.229.230.25
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv03078
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv03082
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv03080
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv03081
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Doe v. Draftkings, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Draftkings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Priester-King v. Bhatti et al
as 1:2024cv03050
Plaintiff:
Daquan Priester-King
Defendant:
Aaqib Bhatti, Steven Carballo, Mubbashar Zahid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.228.200.32
as 1:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.228.200.32
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
