Cases 71 - 80 of 135
Macias v. Jetro Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01571
Defendant:
Stanley Fleishman, Hyco Restaurant Supply Co., Jetro Cash and Carry Enterprises, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alex A. Macias
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00652
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00412
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00269
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jimenez v. Computer Express International Ltd. et al
as 1:2014cv05657
Defendant:
Computer Express International Ltd., Icomp.com Inc., Nathan Kraiem and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gerbo v. Kmart Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv04866
Plaintiff:
Rosalia Gerbo
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation and Nathan's Famous, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Garcia et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04160
Plaintiff:
Gloria Arocho and Oscar Garcia
Defendant:
Police Officers Michael Demonda, Ruben Mijares, Sgt. Nathan Mole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sheard v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03188
Defendant:
City of New York and NYPD Officer Winslow
Plaintiff:
Nathan Sheard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
