Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clervrain v. Cissna et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02197
Defendant: United States District Court for the District of California, United States Department Office of the Labor, United Nations (U.N.) and others
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00480
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivers v. United States of America Government et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01680
Respondent: Every Other Legislature States/Countries, The House of Congress, The Legislaturees of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Petitioner: Enzo Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America et al v. Novartis AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv04265
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Virginia, District of Columbia and others
Defendant: Novartis AG, Novartis Ophthalmics, Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
The United States Of America et al v. Amerisourcebergen Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv04856
Defendant: Amerisourcebergen Corporation, Amerisourcebergen Specialty Group, International Oncology Network and others
Plaintiff: The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Virginia, The District of Columbia, The States of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New Yor and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00263
Defendant: ASD Healthcare, Amerisourcebergen Corporation, Amerisourcebergen Specialty Group and others
Plaintiff: Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia, District of Columbia, States of California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Tennessee and Texas and others
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv03096
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks, State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Defendant: Amgen Inc., Florida Cancer Specialist, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates and others
Interested Party: 21st Century Oncology of Jacksonville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Clayton v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2007cv02179
Plaintiff: Anthony Clayton
Defendant: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frallicciardi v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2007cv00957
Petitioner: Anthony J. Frallicciardi
Respondent: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America, ex rel. Joseph Piacentile v. Amgen Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2004cv03983
Defendant: Amerisource Bergen Corp., Amerisource Bergen Specialty Group, Inc., Amgen Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Virginia, District of Columbia and others
Relator: Kevin Kilcoyne, Joseph Piacentile and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?