Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Metro Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Fraser We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv09358
Plaintiff: Metro Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. d/b/a Star Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Metro Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. doing business as Star Chrysler Jeep Dodge
Defendant: Lionel Fraser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Coleman v. SMG Automotive Holdings LLC
as 1:2023cv08360
Plaintiff: Dorothy Coleman
Defendant: SMG Automotive Holdings LLC doing business as Brooklyn Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Bowen, Jr. v. Westbury Jeep Chrysler, Dodge, Inc., et al
as 2:2023cv06877
Plaintiff: Alexander Bowen, Jr.
Defendant: Westbury Jeep Chrysler, Dodge, Inc. d/b/a Westbury Jeep, Keith Donnelly and Westbury Jeep Chrysler Dodge, Inc. doing business as Westbury Jeep
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Star Auto Sales of Bayside, Inc. et al v. Rosenfield & Company, PLLC
as 1:2023cv04912
Plaintiff: Star Auto Sales of Bayside, Inc. doing business as Star Toyota of Bayside, Star Auto Sales of Queens LLC doing business as Star Subaru, Star Hyundai LLC doing business as Star Hyundai and others
Defendant: Rosenfield & Company, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mannarino et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00144
Plaintiff: Michael Menna, Sophie Mannarino and Michael J. Mannarino, Jr.
Defendant: FCA US LLC, Rockaway Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram, ZF North America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Metro Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. FCA US LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05646
Defendant: FCA US LLC, Stellantis and South Shore Autoplex, LLC doing business as South Shore ChryslerJeep Dodge Ram
Plaintiff: Metro Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. doing business as Star Chrysler Jeep Dodge Fiat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04510
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01309
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2005md01720
Interested Party: Parkside Movies 14, Hampton Allied Pharmacy, Mon Ami Gabi Development LLC, DBA Mon Ami Gabi - Oakbrook and others
Not Classified By Court: Keewatin Sinclair, Valentine Stores, Inc., Alsaker Corp/Broadway Truck Stops and others
Plaintiff: Joe's Crab Shack - Abingdon MD, Inc., William-Sonoma Inc., Plaintiffs in Twisted Spoke v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. 05-cv-5881 JG-JO and others
Petitioner: Jonathan Lee Riches, Karla F. Solis, D.D.S., Inc. d/b/a LA Holistic Dentistry, Mr Gary Friedman and others
Defendant: Defendants in civil action G.E.S. Bakery, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc,. et al. 05-cv-5879 JG-JO, Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants in civil action Performace Labs, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., et al 05-cv-5869 JG-JO and others
Amicus Curiae: The European Commission, Canadian counsel for defendants in Canadian litigation received from and filed by hand by Canadian counsel, Amici Objecting States and others
Interpleader: MNZ Inc
Respondent: Visa Inc.
Intervenor: Keila Ravelo and Mary Watson
3Rd Party Defendant: Discover
Intervenor Plaintiff: Oneota Community Food Co-op
Claimant: St. Louis Airport Taxi, LLC.
In Re: Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01078
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?