Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Liu v. Foley et al
as 1:2021cv04687
Plaintiff:
Xingqi Liu
Defendant:
John Foley, Jill Woodworth, Erik Blachford and others
Genack v. Foley
as 1:2021cv04583
Plaintiff:
Moshe Genack
Defendant:
John Foley, William Lynch, Erik Blachford and others
Drori v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02925
Defendant:
Police Officer John Foley, Jill Woodworth and Peloton Interactive, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leigh Drori
Petitioner:
Richard Neswick
Chu v. Foley et al
as 1:2021cv02862
Defendant:
Pamela Thomas-Graham, Jill Woodworth, William Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Chu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
In Re Peloton Interactive, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 1:2021cv02369
Defendant:
Jill Woodworth, John Foley, Peloton Interactive, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Wilson
Petitioner:
Drew H. Brown, Sr., Jennifer Phung, David C. Millhisler and others
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. 784 Cafe Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06453
Defendant:
784 Cafe Inc. and John Foley
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
J&J Sports Production, Inc. v. 784 Cafe Inc et al
as 2:2015cv06501
Defendant:
784 Cafe Inc and John Foley
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
J&J Sports Production, Inc. v. 784 Cafe Inc et al
as 1:2015cv06501
Defendant:
784 Cafe Inc and John Foley
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Hockenjos et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00095
Defendant:
Angelica Amaya, P.O. Trham Brathwaite, P.O. Yevgeniy Bushuyev and others
718) 332-2638 (fax:
Irina Paramonova Hockenjos and John Hockenjos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
