Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Jiang v. Consulate General of the People's Republic of China in New York
as 1:2024cv02447
Plaintiff: Ziyao Jiang
Defendant: Consulate General of the People's Republic of China in New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kaplan v. Hezbollah We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03187
Defendant: Hezbollah, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Hezballah and others
Plaintiff: Deborah Chana Katzmacher, Danielle Sauter, Rivka Kaplan and others
Special Master: Alan Lee Balaran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Liu v. Chinese Government of the People's Republic of China et al
as 1:2018cv03412
Defendant: ShangHai Greenland Group JiangXi Shen Jiang Real Estate Co. Ltd., Greenland Holding Group Corp. Ltd., Chinese Government of the People's Republic of China and others
Plaintiff: Xinghai Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Purisima v. Zheng et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014mc00876
Defendant: Gu Chunhui, Wang Dang, Does 1-1.3 Billion and others
"President&quot: Nafang Mo
Plaintiff: Anton Purisima
"Manager&quot: Eddie Zheng
In Re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2006md01738
Plaintiff: Plaintiff(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Plaintiff(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Plaintiff(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453 and others
Defendant: Defendant(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Defendant(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Defendant(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453 and others
Amicu: Ministry of Commerce for the Peoples Republic of China and Ministry of Commerce for the Peoples Republic of China
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?