Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stoll v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv04149
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stoll
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. D/B/A CHASE BANK, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC D/B/A ZELLEPAY.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Gonzalez v. Royal Guard Fence Co., Inc. et. al.
as 2:2020cv01004
Defendant:
Westbury Fence & Guide Rail Co., Inc., Ralph Guercia, Gin-Skye Construction Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Saul Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Saravia v. Royal Guard Fence Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02086
Defendant:
Royal Guard Fence Co., Inc., Ralph Guercia, Brenda Stollings and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Saravia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Velasquez v. Royal Guard Fence Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv07360
Defendant:
Royal Guard Fence Co., Inc., Ralph Guercia, Brenda Stollings and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Franklin et al v. Project Hospitality Agency Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00209
Defendant:
Carrie Bloss, Jasmine Feleciano, Ericker Phillips-Onaga and others
Plaintiff:
Africa S. Franklin and Sheralyn T. Franklin
HUD:
Lawrence Hirsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Campbell v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04207
Plaintiff:
Jesse Campbell
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sanders v. New York City Police Dept'm et al
as 1:2007cv04092
Plaintiff:
Rasheen Sanders
Defendant:
New York City Police Dept'm, Kevin Rodgers, Anthony Rivelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
