Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Coates v. Grace et al
as 1:2017cv03667
Defendant:
Vincent Cannucci, Ronald J. Clark, Douglas Colford and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Coates
Full Name Unknown:
Senior Officer Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Torpey et al v. Reliable Fire Protection Corp.
as 2:2010cv01404
Plaintiff:
Robert Bartels, Jr., Kenneth Durr, Alexander E. Gettler and others
Defendant:
Reliable Fire Protection Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Steamfitters' Local Union No. 638 Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Supplemental Retirement Fund, Educational Fund, Vacation Fund, Security Benefit Fund and Industry Promotion Fund et al v. Nexus Mechanical, Inc.
as 1:2008cv03214
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Steamfitters' Local Union No. 638 Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Supplemental Retirement Fund, Educational Fund, Vacation Fund, Security Benefit Fund and Industry Promotion Fund and John J. Torpey
Defendant:
Nexus Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trustees of the Steamfitters' Local Union No. 638 Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Supplemental Retirement Fund, Educational Fund, Vacation Fund, Security Benefit Fund and Industry Promotion Fund et al v. R&S United Services, Inc.
as 1:2008cv03215
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Steamfitters' Local Union No. 638 Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Supplemental Retirement Fund, Educational Fund, Vacation Fund, Security Benefit Fund and Industry Promotion Fund, John J. Torpey and John J. Torpey
Defendant:
R&S United Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trustees of the Steamfitters' Local Union No. 638 Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Supplemental Retirement Fund, Educational Fund, Vacation Fund, Security Benefit Fund and Industry Promotion Fund et al v. Folgore Mobile Welding, Inc.,
as 1:2007cv01389
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Steamfitters' Local Union No. 638 Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Supplemental Retirement Fund, Educational Fund, Vacation Fund, Security Benefit Fund and Industry Promotion Fund and John J. Torpey
Defendant:
Folgore Mobile Welding, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees of the Steamfitters' Local Union No. 638 Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Supplemental Retirement Fund, Educational Fund, Vacation Fund, Security Benefit Fund and Industry Promotion Fund et al v. East Coast Energy Management Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv01386
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Steamfitters' Local Union No. 638 Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Supplemental Retirement Fund, Educational Fund, Vacation Fund, Security Benefit Fund and Industry Promotion Fund, Industry Promotion Fund, John J. Torpey and others
Defendant:
East Coast Energy Management Corp., S J O'Brien Mechanical, Inc., Phoenix Refrigeration Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees of the Steamfitters' Local Union No. 638 Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Supplemental Retirement Fund, Educational Fund, Vacation Fund, Security Benefit Fund and Industry Promotion Fund et al v. Advanced Automatic Sprinkler CO., Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01387
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Steamfitters' Local Union No. 638 Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Supplemental Retirement Fund, Educational Fund, Vacation Fund, Security Benefit Fund and Industry Promotion Fund, Trustees of the Steamfitters' Local Union No. 638 Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Supplemental Retirement Fund, Educational Fund, Vacation Fund, Security Benefit Fund and Industry Promotion Fund, John J. Torpey and others
Defendant:
Advanced Automatic Sprinkler CO., Inc., Advanced Automatic Sprinkler CO., Inc., A & F Fire Protection Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
D'Onofrio v. City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv00731
Plaintiff:
Robert D'Onofrio
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Police Department, Patricia Feely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
