Cases 91 - 100 of 8,431
Kurtz v. Broome County's Northern District of The United States District Court
as 9:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kurtz and T. Kurtz
Defendant:
Broome County's Northern District of The United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Labarge et al
as 9:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Sincere Smith
Defendant:
Labarge, C.O. A.N. Martin, C.O. A.U. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oudekerk v. Curtis et al
as 9:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Oudekerk
Defendant:
C.O. Curtis and C.O. Baily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Boutin et al
as 9:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Khyrel Ware
Defendant:
Boutin, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemon v. New York State et al
as 9:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Callin Lemon
Defendant:
New York State, Mr. J. Corey, Richard Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Lowerre
as 9:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Wardell Watson
Respondent:
E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sierra v. Covello et al
as 9:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E. Baskerville, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seeley v. Delaware County Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Mark L. Seeley
Defendant:
Delaware County Correctional Facility, Empara, C.O. Thad Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Wagar et al
as 9:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ronald David
Defendant:
Mrs. Wagar, Mrs. Bathrick, Sgt. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oudekerk v. Thomas et al
as 9:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Oudekerk
Defendant:
Sergeant Thomas and C.O. Crumb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
