Cases 111 - 120 of 8,433
Arrington v. New York State et al
as 9:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Gary Arrington
Defendant:
New York State and D. G. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurtz et al v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kurtz, T. KURTZ-SCHUMACHER and JESSICA APPLEGATE-BISHOP
Defendant:
The State of New York, AMERICAN MEDICAL ACADEMY, WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuello v. Weaver et al
as 9:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Edwin Cuello
Defendant:
Alan Weaver, Donald Simonds and Daniel McGowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bumpars v. Corey
as 9:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Devante Andrew Bumpars
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York, DOCCS and Joseph Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 9:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Manuel Rivera
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS, C.O. Mannarino, Sgt. Mayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. McGuiness
as 9:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Tommy Davis
Respondent:
Thomas McGuiness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Potter v. Tompkins County et al
as 9:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Mark Potter
Defendant:
Tompkins County and Cayuga County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Struble v. Tope
as 9:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
David E. Struble
Respondent:
Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandford III v. Warden
as 9:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
James Edward Sandford, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
