Cases 21 - 30 of 437
Jones v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Kathlee C. Hochul, Letitia James, Ann Marie T. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kielly v. Miller et al
as 9:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
Sara Kielly
Defendant:
S. Miller and Robert E. Ruger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. The Willows et al
as 9:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
James E. Adams
Defendant:
The Willows and Onondaga County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowler v. Hummel et al
as 9:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Joseph V. Fowler
Defendant:
Christian Hummel, E. Stewart Jones, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Tatro et al
as 9:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
John G. Tatro, Trevor N. Dunning, Darren E. Basford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa v. Hoke et al
as 9:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Juan Rosa
Defendant:
Officer Hoke, John Does 1-9 and Sergeant E. Velie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paulino v. Rickard
as 9:2023cv00469
Petitioner:
Jose Paulino
Respondent:
E. Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McMillan v. Orbegozo et al
as 9:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Jimir S. McMillan
Defendant:
Gabriel Orbegozo, Jonpaul Fowler, Matthew Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos et al v. Parmitel et al
as 9:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Francisco Santos, Windsor Coleman, Miguel Melendez and others
Defendant:
Cheryl Parmitel, Chaz Andrews, W. N. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valchine v. Onondaga County et al
as 9:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Lauren E. Valchine
Cross Defendant:
Onondaga County, Onondaga County Sheriff and Naphcare, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Proactive Health Care Medicine, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
