Cases 1 - 10 of 8,447
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. People of the State of NY
as 9:2024cv00760
Petitioner:
Rajzhaun M. Rouse
Respondent:
People of the State of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrison v. Washington
as 9:2024cv00761
Petitioner:
William Morrison
Respondent:
M. Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jenkins v. Corey
as 9:2024cv00765
Petitioner:
Willie F. Jenkins
Respondent:
Joseph Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reddick v. County of Onondaga et al
as 9:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William H. Reddick, II
Defendant:
County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Justice Center, Sheriff Tobias Shelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman v. Correction Sergeant Thomas et al
as 9:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Roman
Defendant:
Correction Sergeant Thomas, Correction Officer Thomas and Correction Officer John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaDuke v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00748
Petitioner:
Robert LaDuke
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Oneida County Jail et al
as 9:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Smith
Defendant:
Oneida County Jail, Robert Maciol, Patternoster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00733
Petitioner:
Richard Quinn
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quarequio v. Albany County Jail et al
as 9:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Ralph Quarequio
Defendant:
Albany County Jail and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
