Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Archa v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Archa
Defendant:
The State of New York, NYS Department of Correctional Services The Warden of Auburn Correctional Facility, Correction Officer Giboo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandford III v. Warden
as 9:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
James Edward Sandford, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bangs v. Warden of the Suffolk County Jail et al
as 9:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Donald Bangs
Defendant:
Warden of the Suffolk County Jail and All Medical Staff Involved of Suffolk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez-Lazaro v. Warden
as 9:2023cv00329
Petitioner:
Juan Mendez-Lazaro
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Schulz v. Warden
as 9:2023cv00295
Petitioner:
Donald Schulz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Diaz v. Warden
as 9:2023cv00250
Petitioner:
Abel Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bohanon v. Warden
as 9:2023cv00019
Petitioner:
Brandon Keith Bohanon
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. Christensen et al
as 9:2021cv01313
Plaintiff:
Calvin Wright
Defendant:
Warden D. Christensen, Head of Safety D. Roberts and Health Services B. Malcolm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ast v. Warden
as 9:2021cv00969
Petitioner:
John Raymond Ast
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Diaz v. Warden
as 9:2021cv00738
Petitioner:
Francisco Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
