Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Rizzuto v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv00515
Defendant:
John J. Morley, Anthony Black, Owen Zweck and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Rizzuto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Lilley et al
as 9:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sabas Martinez
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilley, Lefield, Captain T. Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Albany Med. Center, D.O.C.C.S. et al
as 9:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
Ashraf Abdullah
Defendant:
Albany Med. Center, D.O.C.C.S., C. Morrow, S. Fredensburgh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreau v. Ellsworth et al
as 9:2020cv00124
Plaintiff:
Emile Moreau
Defendant:
J. Vonderheyde, Sherry Ellsworth and A. Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Canada et al
as 9:2020cv00064
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks, Witchcraft Riddler and Witchcraft Riddler & The Black Magick Bears Cult
Respondent:
Alex Lifeson, Boeing, The Crown Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Lee et al
as 9:2019cv01075
Defendant:
Moore, William Lee, H. Eigo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 1:2019cv00241
Petitioner:
Black
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Funches v. Russo et al
as 9:2017cv01292
Plaintiff:
Trevis L. Funches
Defendant:
Anthony Russo, Blum, C. Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Loricchoandola et al
as 9:2017cv00968
Plaintiff:
Tayari Jackson
Defendant:
Ann E. Loricchoandola, K. Faulkner, Lola Romano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashcroft v. Lee et al
as 9:2017cv00398
Plaintiff:
Eschell Ashcroft
Defendant:
William A. Lee, Russo, Anthony Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
