Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Fredricks v. May et al
as 9:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredricks and Nigel Fredericks
Defendant:
C. May and John Doe Correction Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florance v. Broome County et al
as 9:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Thomas Florance
Defendant:
Broome County, Frederick J. Akshar, Robert Charpinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. Uhler
as 9:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Marquise Frederick
Respondent:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Akshar
as 9:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
Dupray A. Jordan
Respondent:
Frederick J. Akshar, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fredericks v. I.R.C. Entity D.O.C.
as 9:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredericks and Nigel Fredricks
Defendant:
I.R.C. Entity D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredericks v. Nurse Administrative et al
as 9:2022cv01284
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredericks
Defendant:
Nurse Administrative, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredericks v. Dental Staff John Doe
as 9:2022cv01260
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredericks and Nigel Fredricks
Defendant:
Dental Staff John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredericks v. State of New York DOC/Albany
as 9:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredericks and Nigel Fredricks
Defendant:
State of New York DOC/Albany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredericks v. Sergeant John Doe et al
as 9:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredericks and Nigel Fredricks
Defendant:
Sergeant John Doe, Correctional Officer Jane Doe, Mental Health Doctor Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. McCarthy et al
as 9:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
T. McCarthy, Anderson, Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
