Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Garcia v. McIntosh et al
as 9:2021cv00135
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Welington Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Warden et al
as 9:2020cv01610
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
John Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole et al v. Bendixen et al
as 6:2020cv00697
Defendant:
Thomas Oelrichs, Jeff Raney, Randy Mooney and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 7, Charles C. Manner, John Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McGaughy v. Sero et al
as 9:2019cv01114
Defendant:
Campbell, D. Venettozzi, John Doe #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald McGaughy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Donahue et al
as 9:2019cv00722
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, Mr. Russo, Mr. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Felipe Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Uhler et al
as 9:2019cv00428
Defendant:
P. Woodruff, Welch, Jeffries and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Agee v. Cuomo et al
as 9:2019cv00057
Defendant:
Mr. Anthony J. Annucci, John/Jane Doe(s) #4, Joseph Bellnier and others
Plaintiff:
Jkendric Jirelle Agee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maloy v. Hilts et al
as 9:2018cv01367
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #20, C. Rowe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Maloy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Doe #1 et al
as 9:2018cv01333
Defendant:
Holland, John Doe #5, E. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Nyjee L. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Annucci et al
as 9:2018cv00762
Defendant:
John Doe #5, D. Moon, J. Stanton and others
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Cooper, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.