Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hawk v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Leah Hawk
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bristol et al v. Town of Camden et al
as 6:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Todd Bristol, Kimberly Bristol and Sugar Shack's Water Inc.
Defendant:
Town of Camden, Town of Camden Planning Board, Town of Camden Town Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Green v. McKoy et al
as 9:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Shawn Green
Defendant:
Jeff McKoy, Donald E. Venettozzi, Jane/John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawk v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00455
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Leah Hawk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Riano-Orjueal v. Annucci et al
as 9:2018cv00489
Defendant:
D. Venettozi, G. Lehoisky, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Plaintiff:
John Riano-Orjueal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Miller et al
as 9:2018cv00494
Defendant:
Meaghan Bernstein, Corey Jackson, Deborah J. McCulloch and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dizak v. Hawks et al
as 9:2015cv01171
Plaintiff:
Stuart Dizak
Defendant:
B. Hawks, D. Lavallee, G. Gibilaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Price Chopper Operating Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Price Chopper Operating Co., Inc. and The Golub Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Keitt v. Hawks et al
as 9:2013cv00850
Plaintiff:
Devin Keitt
Defendant:
T. Hawk , M. Lira , D. Uhler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Gonyea et al
as 9:2012cv01883
Plaintiff:
Anderson Carter
Defendant:
Gonyea, Brian Fischer, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
