Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
In Re Norfolk Southern Corporation Bond/Note Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv04068
Plaintiff: Ohio Carpenters Pension Fund and City of Pontiac Reestablished General Employees Retirement System
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation, Alan H. Shaw, James A. Squires and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Strauss et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10823
Plaintiff: Justin Strauss, Donald Smith, Rhea Shome and others
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Strauss et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2022cv10821
Plaintiff: Justin Strauss, Donald Smith, Rhea Shome and others
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Owens et al v. Taliban We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01949
Defendant: Taliban and Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
Plaintiff: James Owens, Estate of Betty Owens Evely, Gary Robert Owens and others
Not Classified By Court: Christine O'Neil
Interested Party: Anne Wodenshek, Sarah Wodenshek, Haley Wodenshek and others
Garnishee: Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Collector's Coffee Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv04355
Plaintiff: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Mykalai Kontilai, Colletor's Coffee Inc., Collector's Coffee Inc. and others
Material Witne: Veronica Kontilai
Petitioner: Debevoise & Plimpton LLP and Timothy Dennin
Intervenor Defendant: Los Angeles Dodgers LLC, Collector's Coffee, Inc., Doe Individuals 1 thorugh 50 and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: SDJ Investments, LLC, Adobe Investments, LLC and Darren Sivertsen
Not Classified By Court: Curtis Alva, Steven C Sessa, William J. Leone and others
Interested Party: Gail Herman-Holt
In Re Nokia Corporation Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03982
Defendant: Nokia Corporation, Timo Ihamuotila, Kristian Pullola and others
Plaintiff: J. Phillip Max
Petitioner: Soui Ying Ling, Wei Ming Lin and Clyde W. Waite
Owens et al v. Reublic of Sudan, Ministry of the interior of the Republic of Sudan, the Islamic Republic of Iran, The Iranian Ministry of Info. & Security
as 1:2012mc00243
Plaintiff: James Owens , Gary Robert Owens , Barbara Goff and others
Defendant: REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and THE IRANIAN MINISTRY of INFO. & SECURITY
Cause Of Action: M 90 Order of Attachment
Pittsburg SNF LLC et al
as 1:2012mc00202
Plaintiff: Pittsburg SNF LLC , Balch Springs SNF LLC , Bay Oaks SNF LLC and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Pharmerica East, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant: Pharmaster L. P , Pharmaster GP, LLC , Peter Licari and others
Miscellaneou: Jacob Karmel
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Abad et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2005cv05601
Plaintiff: Hilda Lopez, Jim Mcloughlin, Farris Coley and others
Defendant: Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc., Olympic Plumbing & Heating Corp., Trammel Crow Corporate Services, Inc. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Miguel Lopez and Skidmore Owings Merrill LLP
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Owens et al
as 1:2011mc00037
Plaintiff: James Owens , Gary Robert Owens , Barbara Goff and others
Defendant: Republic of Sudan , Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of the Sudan, The Islamic Republic of Iran and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case - Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?