Cases 121 - 130 of 198
De La Rosa v. McDonald's Restaurants of New York, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00696
Plaintiff:
Dedra De La Rosa
Defendant:
McDonald's Restaurants of New York, Inc. , Six Times Square Center Partners, L.P. and Lewis Foods of 42nd Street LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Valle v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Israel Valle
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack H. Obama, George W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
la Rocque v. Orangetown Justice Court et al
as 1:2012cv09120
Plaintiff:
Lewis la Rocque
Defendant:
Orangetown Justice Court, Denise A. Sullivan, Richard C. Finning and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Refund of penalty imposed by I.R.S.
White v. Brofsky
as 1:2012cv08806
Plaintiff:
Jamel White
Defendant:
Lewis A. Brofsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
White v. Borofsky
as 1:2012cv08853
Defendant:
Lewis A. Borofsky
Plaintiff:
Jamel White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dunbar v. Cardinal McCloskey Services et al
as 1:2012cv07909
Plaintiff:
Lavern M. Dunbar
Defendant:
Cardinal McCloskey Services, Mark Lewis, Pamela Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis v. Deutsche Bank et al
as 1:2012cv07081
Plaintiff:
Petronella Lewis
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank and Richard Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law
Lewis v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv04433
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lewis
Defendant:
The City of New York and John Does #s 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Groben v. Whelan et al
as 7:2012cv04409
Plaintiff:
Christopher Groben
Defendant:
Jim Whelan, Joseph Donza, Edwin Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
