Cases 21 - 30 of 7,470
Wah v. Vargas et al
as 1:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Hop Wah
Defendant:
Javier E. Vargas, Antonolla Papaloo, Nicole Wint-Baksh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hammad et al v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Nusayba Hammad, Eric Horowitz, Sajia Hanif and others
Defendant:
William C. Thompson, Jr., Sandra Wilkin, Michael Aravanites and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
John Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Mayor Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballard v. County of Rockland et al
as 7:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Wayne Ballard
Defendant:
County of Rockland, Thomas E. Walsh, II, Peter Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sx Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 d Federally Assisted Programs
Voskin et al v. Zeus Networks, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02862
Plaintiff:
Ella Voskin and Umed Makhsumov
Defendant:
Zeus Networks, LLC, John and Jane Does 1-10 and Business Entities A-J
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Enkin v. Doe
as 1:2024cv02834
Plaintiff:
Tatyana Enkin
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Doe v. Praxis Housing Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02703
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Praxis Housing Initiatives, Inc. and Shauntee Garnett
Doe v. Praxis Housing Initiatives, Inc. (Praxis) et al
as 1:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Praxis Housing Initiatives, Inc. (Praxis) and Shauntee Garnett
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
