Cases 101 - 110 of 122
Canales Sanchez v. Harris et al
as 1:2009cv10323
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Canales Sanchez
Defendant:
Harris and Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Goldberg
as 1:2009cv09597
Plaintiff:
Angel Sanchez
Defendant:
Randy Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. Doe et al
as 1:2009cv08743
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Sanchez
Defendant:
John Doe, 2nd Badge. F.C.I. Fiarton N.J., Codogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez-Sanchez v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv08515
Petitioner:
Cesar Lopez-Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Segura-Sanchez v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv08525
Petitioner:
Claudio Segura-Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez v. Victoria Secret Stores L.L.C. et al
as 1:2009cv06994
Plaintiff:
Juan Sanchez
Defendant:
Victoria Secret Stores L.L.C., Manager-Susie, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daley v. DOC G.R.V.C. et al
as 1:2009cv05907
Plaintiff:
James Daley
Defendant:
DOC G.R.V.C., Gerald O'Gerar, Rodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Dr. Lester N. Wright, M.D. MPH et al
as 1:2009cv04231
Plaintiff:
Carlos Sanchez
Defendant:
Dr. Lester N. Wright, M.D. MPH, Dr. Rao, M.D. and Mrs. Alicia Schunk, RPAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Genao v. NYC Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv03723
Plaintiff:
Gabino Genao
Defendant:
NYC Dept. of Corrections, Ricci, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sarrazin v. Head of Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv01517
Plaintiff:
Vertnell Sarrazin
Defendant:
Head of Department of Corrections, Canty, John and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
