Cases 101 - 110 of 23,094
Pierre-Lys v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02759
Petitioner:
Roodolph L. Pierre-Lys
Respondent:
State of New York and Amy Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peralta v. Khouri
as 1:2024cv02760
Plaintiff:
Jimy J. Peralta
Defendant:
Doctor Khouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seymour v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Ernest Peter Seymour, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Miller, C.O. James Schonmann, Daniel Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Janczuk v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv02738
Plaintiff:
Weronika E. Janczuk
Defendant:
United States of America and Institution/Financial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bettis v. All Known and Unknown Agents et al
as 1:2024cv02854
Petitioner:
Zubearu Bettis
Respondent:
All Known and Unknown Agents and Employees of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. McDonnell et al
as 1:2024cv02762
Plaintiff:
Quandell Hickman
Defendant:
Abel McDonnell, Dian Eze and Alvin Bragg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bahadorifar v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02732
Plaintiff:
Bahadorifar
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dorta-Hernandez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02773
Petitioner:
Saul Dorta-Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodriguez v. Burke et al
as 1:2024cv02715
Petitioner:
Andres Rodriguez
Respondent:
James M. Burke and D. Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
