Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Owen v. Conway
as 1:2010cv03183
Petitioner:
David Owen
Respondent:
James T. Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crichlow v. Horn et al
as 1:2009cv09596
Plaintiff:
Kevin Damion Crichlow
Defendant:
Martin Horn, Michael Hourihane, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Yellech
as 1:2009cv08218
Petitioner:
Owen Clarke
Respondent:
Bruce Yellech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Shanahan et al
as 1:2009cv06869
Petitioner:
Jason Owen Hamilton
Respondent:
Christopher Shanahan, Deportation Officer Ramos, Deportation Officer Portales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
He'ron v. State Commission on Judicial Conduct, New York State et al
as 1:2009cv05040
Plaintiff:
Michael Owen He'ron
Defendant:
State Commission on Judicial Conduct, New York State, Thomas A. Klonick, Stephen R. Coffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sallee v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv05848
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Franklin Sallee, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Richard Owen's and Southern District Court of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stuart v. American Insulation et al
as 1:2008cv03923
Plaintiff:
Cal Stuart
Defendant:
American Insulation, Anchor Packing Company, Combustion Engineering and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garner v. Owens et al
as 1:2007cv11513
Plaintiff:
Eric Garner
Defendant:
William Owens, The City of New York and The New York Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCray v. NYSDOC, et al
as 1:2000cv05255
Plaintiff:
Harry L. McCray
Defendant:
New York State Dept. of Corrections, Commissioner Fredick C. Larny, Comm. PO Reardon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
