Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Porter v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv05452
Plaintiff:
Jason Porter
Defendant:
New York City, Department of Corrections, V. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01581
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Parker v. New York State Department of Correction
as 1:2010cv00279
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Parker
Defendant:
New York State Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv08835
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Orvin Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Parker v. N.Y.C. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv06898
Plaintiff:
Keenen Parker
Defendant:
N.Y.C. Department of Corrections, Boston, Cumberbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. The New York Public Library et al
as 1:2009cv05020
Plaintiff:
Shoshanna Morgan
Defendant:
The New York Public Library, Shawn Jones, Clyde Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Parker et al
as 1:2009cv05021
Plaintiff:
Shoshanna Morgan
Defendant:
Clyde Parker, Chris Williams and Edga Consono
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Woughter
as 1:2009cv03843
Petitioner:
Jason Parker
Respondent:
Carol Woughter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Williams et al
as 1:2009cv03288
Plaintiff:
Shoshanna Morgan
Defendant:
Christopher Williams, Clyde Parker, Edga Conseono and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuadrado v. City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv01425
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cuadrado
Defendant:
City of New York, Ellen Cesarksi, New York County Department of Probation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
