Cases 51 - 60 of 117
Patterson v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv01150
Petitioner:
Brian Patterson
Respondent:
U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lucas v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv01184
Plaintiff:
Trevor Lucas
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Kettisha Manson-Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Tillman et al
as 1:2016cv08188
Defendant:
James Tillman and The Federal Bureau of Prison Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kennard Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdur-Rahman v. Samuel et al
as 1:2016cv00297
Petitioner:
Yusuf Abdur-Rahman
Respondent:
Charles S. Samuel, Jr., Eric Anderson, Cordella Malloy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDaniels v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv06163
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne McDaniels
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Diane Sommer, Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv03240
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jordan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Xiao-Ke Gao, Warden, United States Penitentiary-Marion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Economou v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2015cv00902
Plaintiff:
Thomas Economou
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chicarielli v. The United States Of America et al
as 1:2014cv06765
Plaintiff:
Joseph Chicarielli
Defendant:
The United States Of America, U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ), Federal Bureau of Prison, (FBOP) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Nyenekor v. Baird et al
as 1:2014cv06571
Petitioner:
Carpeah Rudolph Nyenekor, Sr.
Respondent:
Baird, Chairman of the Federal Bureau of Prison and Regional Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
