Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Beaty v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv06011
Plaintiff:
Duane Beaty
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hussey v. The Owner of/at Duane Reade (Jane Doe / John Doe) et al
as 1:2023cv03561
Plaintiff:
Yessuh Suhyes Hussey
Defendant:
The Owner of/at Duane Reade (Jane Doe / John Doe) and The Owner and person in charge of Walgreens (Jane Doe / John Doe)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. U.S. Treasury Department et al
as 1:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
Duane L. Berry
Defendant:
U.S. Treasury Department and USM-285 Executed Warrants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaty v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv08206
Plaintiff:
Duane Beaty
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Howard
as 7:2022cv01730
Petitioner:
Duan Jones
Respondent:
David Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05540
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Berry v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 1:2021cv01377
Plaintiff:
Duane L. Berry
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury and Seized Federal Securities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Duane Reade Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv07578
Defendant:
Duane Reade Corporation, Chris Oneil and Lewis Ramon Casilla
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv11481
Plaintiff:
Duane Moore
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ifill et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04548
Plaintiff:
Richard Sunday Ifill, Daniel Rice, Ralph Wilson and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, DeBlasio, The Commissioner Environmental Health Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
