Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 1:2023cv02710
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ardaneh v. U.S. Government et al
as 1:2020cv03450
Defendant:
Evaluator Sara Laniado, Clerk of the Brockton District Court, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Hamid Reza Ardaneh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alava v. Lamanna et al
as 7:2019cv06523
Defendant:
Ms. Conn, C.O. Chin, Sgt. Corbie and others
Plaintiff:
Princess Debbie Alava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. Mahoney
as 1:2018cv11937
Defendant:
Dana Mahoney
Plaintiff:
Ivan Sean Barton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oseni v. Mahoney
as 1:2016cv08743
Petitioner:
Kayode Oseni
Respondent:
William S. Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCray et al v. New York State et al
as 1:2013cv04766
Plaintiff:
Cerious McCray and Kimberly Casanova
Defendant:
New York State, State Commission of Correction (SCOC), Thomas A. Beilein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahoney v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv06717
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mahoney
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Police Dept., Woodhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuler-Gibson v. The New York Division of Parole et al
as 1:2012cv05051
Plaintiff:
Jesse Shuler-Gibson
Defendant:
The New York Division of Parole, Pittman and William Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl v. The City of Yonkers et al
as 1:2010cv03273
Plaintiff:
Kim Carl
Defendant:
The City of Yonkers, Brian McCormack, Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Pritchard et al
as 1:2008cv09587
Plaintiff:
Warren Timothy Johnson
Defendant:
Pritchard, Jean, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
