Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Antetokounmpo v. Inverso et al
as 1:2021cv08731
Plaintiff:
GIANNIS ANTETOKOUNMPO
Defendant:
Gavin Inverso, Joe Infanti, Nathan Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Yu v. Robins et al
as 1:2021cv08351
Plaintiff:
Jiahan Yu and Diamond Eagle Acquisition Corp.
Defendant:
Jason D. Robins, Jason K. Park, Jeff Sagansky and others
Nominal Defendant:
Draftkings Inc. and Draftkings Inc. formerly doing business as Diamond Eagle Acquisition Corp.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv02224
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christina v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv08163
Plaintiff:
Gavin Christina and Christina Gavin
Defendant:
The City of New York, Police Officer Gerard Dowling, Police Officer Matthew Tocco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Hoover v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06145
Defendant:
Paul G. Gabos, Gavin Southwell, Paul E. Avery and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Hoover
Glaze v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06118
Defendant:
Paul G. Gabos, Gavin Southwell, Paul E. Avery and others
Plaintiff:
Orville Bernard Glaze, Jr.
Shine v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05976
Defendant:
Paul Gabos, Gavin Southwell, Benefytt Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Shine
Denimal et al v. Prodigy Network, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00968
Plaintiff:
Francois Denimal, Raquette View Limited, John Friedman and others
Defendant:
1234 W Randolph NewCo, Inc. and Prodigy Network, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Finders et al v. BK 19 Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11802
Defendant:
Babak Khorrami, Peter Rabasco, BK 19 Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gavin Finders and Claire Villard-Finders
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 294
Blockchain Capital, LLC v. Blockchain Capital Limited et al
as 1:2019cv07847
Defendant:
Blockchain Capital Limited and Gavin Brown
Plaintiff:
Blockchain Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
