Cases 21 - 30 of 1,891
IN RE: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb, et al
as 1:2024cv03094
Not Yet Classified:
Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust
Defendant:
Jeremiah Darnell Webb, Noah Sencer Robert Barclay, Malakai Levi Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
John Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Mayor Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Illery v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Lora Elizabeth Illery
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reyes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02849
Plaintiff:
Indira Reyes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Utter v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02805
Plaintiff:
Lisa A Utter
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pondi v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv02684
Plaintiff:
Seth Adam Pondi
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Peyton v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02629
Plaintiff:
Chanmatee Peyton
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robinson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02624
Plaintiff:
Derrick Robinson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Herskovits v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02570
Plaintiff:
Joel Herskovits
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Latif v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv02582
Plaintiff:
Musa Abdul Latif
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
