Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Walter v. The State Of New York et al
as 1:2010cv08722
Plaintiff:
Margarita T. Walter
Defendant:
The State Of New York, The Office of Court Administration of The Unified Court System of The State of New York, Jonathan Lippman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv08575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07659
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Martinez v. Quirk et al
as 1:2010cv02533
Plaintiff:
Carlos Martinez
Defendant:
Dennis Quirk, New York State Court Officers Association, Kevin Scanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pollack et al v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2010cv00135
Plaintiff:
Ruth M. Pollack, Esq. and Ruth M. Pollack
Defendant:
State Of New York, State of New York Second Department Supreme Court Apellate Division, State of New York Office of Court Administration of The Unified Court System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv06552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dibbs v. Mazzarelli et al
as 1:2009cv05938
Plaintiff:
Stephen Dibbs
Defendant:
Angela Mazzarelli, Joan Lobis, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
