Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Rite Aid of New York, Inc. v. 1199SEIU United HealthCare Workers East
as 1:2017cv04371
Plaintiff:
Rite Aid of New York, Inc.
Defendant:
1199SEIU United HealthCare Workers East
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Rite Aid of New York, Inc. v. 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East
as 1:2017cv02173
Plaintiff:
Rite Aid of New York, Inc.
Defendant:
1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Rite Aid of New York, Inc. v. 1199SEIU United HealthCare Workers East
as 1:2017cv01667
Petitioner:
Rite Aid of New York, Inc.
Respondent:
1199SEIU United HealthCare Workers East
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
1199SEIU United HealthCare Workers East v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc.
as 1:2016cv10040
Petitioner:
1199SEIU United HealthCare Workers East
Respondent:
Rite Aid of New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Karfiol v. Rite Aid of New York
as 1:2016cv10004
Plaintiff:
Lyane Karfiol
Defendant:
Rite Aid of New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
1199SEIU United HealthCare Workers East v. Rite Aid of New York Inc
as 1:2016cv08646
Plaintiff:
1199SEIU United HealthCare Workers East
Defendant:
Rite Aid of New York Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hicks v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv04363
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hicks
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Police Department, McAloon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
