Cases 51 - 60 of 325
Scott v. Centennial Resource Development, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06906
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Centennial Resource Development, Inc., Sean R. Smith, Maire A. Baldwin and others
Schnupp v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06117
Plaintiff:
Timothy Schnupp
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Catherine Friedman, Jean-Pierre Garnier and others
Louissant v. Marquez et al
as 1:2022cv04998
Plaintiff:
Pierre E. Louissant
Defendant:
Anselmo Marquez, McCollister's Transportation Group, Inc., aka Advance Technlg Transporting, LLC, McCollister's Transportation Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Wang v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06116
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, M.D., Catherine Friedman and others
Pierre-Louis v. Custom Metalcrafters, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06717
Plaintiff:
Gargy Pierre-Louis
Defendant:
Custom Metalcrafters, Inc. and Stephen Rosner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walton v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06171
Plaintiff:
James Walton
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Catherine J. Friedman, Jean-Pierre Garnier and others
Williams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv06120
Plaintiff:
Joseph Williams, Davis Lenz, Danny Leverette and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Riley v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06359
Plaintiff:
Sean Riley
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., G. Kelly Martin, Owen Hughes and others
Lavi v. MUFG Bank et al
as 1:2022cv03167
Plaintiff:
Pierre Lavi
Defendant:
MUFG Bank and Danamon Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joublin
as 1:2022cv04397
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Hugues Pierre Joublin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
