Cases 1 - 10 of 273
Wang v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04198
Plaintiff:
Hao Zhe Wang
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and North Lane Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Ransley v. 150 West 21st LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01730
Plaintiff:
John Ransley
Defendant:
150 West 21st LLC and Beach Lane Management, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Mark Scharfman
Lane v. Science 37 Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Myra Lane
Defendant:
Science 37 Holdings, Inc., David Coman, Robert Faulkner and others
Chavez v. bit.ly/sru1466418 et al
as 1:2023cv11284
Plaintiff:
Juan P. Chavez
Defendant:
bit.ly/sru1466418, D.O.E., DOE(S) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Park Lane Mosholou LLC v. 45 East Mosholou LLC
as 1:2023cv09551
Plaintiff:
Park Lane Mosholou LLC
Defendant:
45 E Mosholou LLC and 45 East Mosholou LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fa Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Park Lane IBS, LLC et al v. Unbnd Group Pty Ltd.
as 1:2023cv08620
Petitioner:
Park Lane IBS, LLC and Stonehaven, LLC
Respondent:
Unbnd Group Pty Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
The 32BJ North Pension Fund and its Board of Trustees v. Park Lane Mosholu LLC et al
as 7:2023cv08416
Plaintiff:
The 32BJ North Pension Fund and its Board of Trustees
Defendant:
Park Lane Mosholu LLC, Richardson Realty Mandarin South LLC, Rettner Master LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.: Enforcement - Civil Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
