Cases 1 - 10 of 244
Burns Engineering, Inc. v. Arup USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04556
Plaintiff:
Burns Engineering, Inc.
Defendant:
Arup USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 bc Breach of Contract
Tung et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2024cv02590
Plaintiff:
Crystal Tung and Jiayou Luo
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burns v. Sheck et al
as 1:2024cv02361
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
Olivia Sheck, Nurse Mitchell, Dr. Laura Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Smith
as 1:2024cv01860
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
Patrick A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lavale Burns v. UP Fintech Holding Limited et al
as 1:2024cv01632
Plaintiff:
Lavale Burns
Petitioner:
Ang Xiangwei Darren, Ryann Jiin Yuan Lai, Christopher L. Dudleck and others
Defendant:
UP Fintech Holding Limited, Tianhua Wu and John Fei Zeng
Rivera v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 1:2023cv11325
Plaintiff:
Manuel Rivera
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS, C.O. Mannarino, Sgt. Mayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. County of Westchester
as 1:2023cv09880
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
County of Westchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. City of Yonkers et al
as 1:2023cv09787
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
City of Yonkers, County of Westchester, Captain Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Clinton
as 1:2023cv09621
Petitioner:
Trevor Burns
Respondent:
Joe Clinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
