Cases 1 - 10 of 276
352 Capital GP LLC v. Wear et al
as 1:2024cv05102
Defendant:
WST AZ Properties LLC, Creative Technologies, LLC, Water Station Management, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
352 Capital GP LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wang v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04198
Defendant:
North Lane Technologies Inc. and AT&T Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hao Zhe Wang
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04836
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Recant v. Day et al
as 1:2024cv04117
Defendant:
Donna Recant, Paul Marks, Sargent Female NYC Police Dept 23rd Precinct and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Recant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03843
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Ransley v. 150 West 21st LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01730
Plaintiff:
John Ransley
Defendant:
150 West 21st LLC and Beach Lane Management, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Mark Scharfman
Lane v. Science 37 Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Myra Lane
Defendant:
Science 37 Holdings, Inc., David Coman, Robert Faulkner and others
Chavez v. bit.ly/sru1466418 et al
as 1:2023cv11284
Plaintiff:
Juan P. Chavez
Defendant:
bit.ly/sru1466418, D.O.E., DOE(S) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Park Lane Mosholou LLC v. 45 East Mosholou LLC
as 1:2023cv09551
Plaintiff:
Park Lane Mosholou LLC
Defendant:
45 E Mosholou LLC and 45 East Mosholou LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fa Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
