Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Vanek v. Samsung EMS Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv03127
Plaintiff:
YAAKOV G VANEK and Yaakov G. Vanek
Defendant:
SAMSUNG EMS CO., LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, CO., LTD, SANG WON LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ri Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MYL Litigation Recovery I LLC v. Mylan N.V. et al
as 1:2019cv01799
Plaintiff:
MYL Litigation Recovery I LLC
Defendant:
John D. Sheehan, Rajiv Malik, Paul B. Campbell and others
Naughton et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11748
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Occhicone, Anthony Palumbo, Christopher Paglia and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Candia et al v. Arturo's Park Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04241
Plaintiff:
Antolin Nicolas Candia
Defendant:
Arturo's Park Inc. , JJ Nap Inc. , Joseph Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perdue v. Mylan N.V. et al
as 1:2016cv08000
Plaintiff:
Landon W. Perdue
Defendant:
Mylan N.V., Mylan Inc., Heather Bresch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Asencio v. Arturo's Park, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09186
Plaintiff:
Pedro Asencio
Defendant:
Arturo's Park, Inc., JJ Nap Inc. and Joseph Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cruz v. Jin Market Corp. d/b/a Hudson Market et al
as 1:2015cv06416
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cruz
Defendant:
Hyong Kun Yi, Maria S. Park and Jin Market Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Shtilman v. Parks et al
as 1:2015cv02231
Plaintiff:
Sergey Shtilman
Defendant:
S. Parks, Sgt. Baker, Steven Critelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortner v. Bally's Park Place, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08621
Plaintiff:
Ruth Ortner
Defendant:
Bally's Park Place, Inc., Caesars Operating Company, Inc., Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
