Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01372
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gill v. American Elite Recovery, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01058
Defendant:
Mark Miller, American Elite Recovery, LLC and Mark M. Miller
Plaintiff:
Caitlyn Gill, Kaneesha Smith, Elizabeth Piacente and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06508
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Green v. Bank of America Merrill Lynch et al
as 1:2019cv00751
Petitioner:
Versel Green
Respondent:
Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Merrill Edge Advisory Center and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
City of Lackawanna, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00485
Defendant:
SpecGX, LLC, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Lackawanna, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Geneva, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 6:2019cv06186
Defendant:
Specgx, LLC, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Geneva, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Systems Management Planning, Inc. v. Smith
as 6:2017cv06896
Plaintiff:
Systems Management Planning, Inc.
Defendant:
Sara Smith
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Smith v. Diverse Funding Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01285
Plaintiff:
Shamika Smith
Defendant:
Diverse Funding Associates, LLC and JH Portfolio Debt Equities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Stephen Einstein & Associates, P.C.
as 1:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
Marcus Smith
Defendant:
Stephen Einstein & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
