Cases 141 - 150 of 7,204
Castro-Almonte v. Searls
as 1:2023cv01160
Petitioner:
Luis D. Castro-Almonte
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Houmita v. United States of America et al
as 6:2023cv06631
Plaintiff:
Abdelhakim Houmita
Defendant:
United States of America, Akima Global Services LLC, AGS Officer 1 (hereinafter "TOM") and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Kobrin
as 1:2023cv01156
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Lt. Kobrin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Champluvier v. State of New York et al
as 6:2023cv06626
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Champluvier
Defendant:
State of New York, Officer Gardner, Sgt. Staldmier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toussaint v. Doe 1 et al
as 6:2023cv06622
Plaintiff:
Dwight Toussaint
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Bedient et al
as 6:2023cv06621
Plaintiff:
Asa Roberts
Defendant:
Sgt. Bobbi Bedient, C.O. Donald Spotts, Nurse Joanne Schmitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. USA
as 6:2023cv06615
Petitioner:
Shawn Lemar Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sally v. Ulgher et al
as 6:2023cv06620
Plaintiff:
Raymund E. Sally
Defendant:
Donald Ulgher and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Aurrichio
as 1:2023cv01121
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
James Quinn Aurrichio and James Quinn Auricchio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Hockwater
as 1:2023cv01123
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Michael Hockwater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
