Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Thomas v. The People of the State of New York
as 1:2009cv01055
Petitioner:
Rand A. Thomas
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. The People of the State of New York
as 6:2009cv06503
Petitioner:
Kemar Turner
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ubiles v. The People of the State of New York
as 1:2009cv00688
Petitioner:
Anitha Ubiles
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vibbert v. People of the State of New York
as 1:2009cv00327
Petitioner:
Andrew J. Vibbert
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. People of the State of New York
as 6:2008cv06529
Petitioner:
Andre L. Lewis
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muldrow v. People of the State of New York
as 6:2008cv06503
Petitioner:
Lucious Muldrow
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. People of the State of New York
as 6:2008cv06493
Petitioner:
Andre L. Lewis
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Waterman v. The People of the State of New York
as 6:2008cv06405
Petitioner:
Lee Roy Waterman
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stroman v. People of the State of New York et al
as 1:2007cv00830
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Stroman
Defendant:
People of the State of New York, Brian Fischer, David F. Napoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGrail v. The People of the State of New York
as 1:2007cv00828
Petitioner:
Richard McGrail
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
