Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Johnson v. DHS, ICE et al
as 1:2013cv00288
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeremiah Johnson
Defendant:
DHS, ICE, Michael Phillips, Todd Tryon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00203
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01149
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mohamed v. U.S.C.I.S. DHS ICE
as 1:2010cv00182
Petitioner:
Kamal Mohamed
Respondent:
U.S.C.I.S. DHS ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robertson v. DHS/ICE. of Buffalo, New York et al
as 1:2009cv00653
Petitioner:
Jeremy Robertson
Respondent:
DHS/ICE. of Buffalo, New York, District Attorney General Acting of Buffalo, New York, Terrry P. Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson-Cadenas v. DHS/ICE. of Buffalo, New York et al
as 6:2009cv06226
Petitioner:
Pedro Wilson-Cadenas
Respondent:
DHS/ICE. of Buffalo, New York, Terry P. Flynn, Jim Grable and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. DHS/ICE of Buffalo, New York et al
as 1:2009cv00367
Petitioner:
Jessie Lewis
Respondent:
DHS/ICE of Buffalo, New York, Terry P. Flynn, Jim Grable and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Denis v. DHS/ICE et al
as 6:2009cv06152
Petitioner:
Ludens Denis
Respondent:
DHS/ICE, District Attorney General Acting of Buffalo, New Yrok, Jim Grable and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Arthur v. DHS/ICE et al
as 6:2009cv06130
Petitioner:
Alberto Arthur
Respondent:
DHS/ICE, Terrance P. Flynn, Carol G. Bridge and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
