Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dougherty v. Autoliv ASP Inc., et al
as 1:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Joseph John Dougherty
Defendant:
DAP Products, Inc., Donald McKay Smith Inc, Honeywell International Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Pneumo Abex LLC, R.E. Kramig & Co., Inc., Red Seal Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Maclachlan et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2015cv10001
Defendant:
BMI Refractory Services, Inc., Georgia-Pacific LLC, General Electric Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Maclachlan and Pat Maclachlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Maclachlan et al v. 3M et al
as 1:2014cv10001
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc., General Refractories Company, (1 - 100) John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Pat Maclachlan
Cross Claimant:
Oakfabco, Inc. and George V. Hamilton, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Donald Maclachlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Brazelton v. Goodrich Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv10002
Plaintiff:
Bernice Brazelton
Defendant:
Goodrich Corporation , Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company , Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanford v. Acorn Iron & Supply Co. et al
as 1:2010cv10001
Defendant:
Acorn Iron & Supply Co., Anchor Packing Co., Argo International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Ephram Stanford
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Zienkowski v. Oglebay Norton Company et al
as 1:2004cv20005
Plaintiff:
Betty Zienkowski
Defendant:
Oglebay Norton Company, Quigley Company, Inc., Quigley Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Varckette v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
as 1:1993cv14171
Plaintiff:
Marie A Varckette
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. , Abex Corporation , Allied Signal, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Abex Corporation, Allied Signal, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
