Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Eckstein v. Lloyd et al.
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Andrew Eckstein
Defendant:
Inspector Diane Lloyd, Warden Jennifer Black and Lutinent D. Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wormald v. Bracy et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Ashley Wormald
Defendant:
Warden Charmaine Bracy, Warden LaShann Eppinger, Brandon Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Miller v. Biltz et al
as 1:2020cv01735
Defendant:
Mr. Lloyd, Ms. Henery, Vencot Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason et al v. Eddy et al
as 1:2018cv02968
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Mona Parks, Tina Costello and others
Plaintiff:
Edward McMillen, Jeffrey D. Mann, Matt Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch et al v. United States et al
as 1:2012cv02238
Plaintiff:
Edward Welch, John Roosevelt Baccus, Patrick Strozier and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Benita Y. Pearson, Thomas J. McAvoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2008cv02075
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Northeast Ohio Correctional Center and Unknown Northeast Ohio Correctional Center Urine Sample Gathering Officer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maxwell v. United States et al
as 4:2007cv02851
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Defendant:
United States and Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Maxwell vs. United States, et al.
as 4:2007cv02796
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Defendant:
United States and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Maxwell v. United States of America
as 4:2007cv02472
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
