Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bektas v. Lorain County Job and Family Service et al
as 1:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
Haydar Bektas
Defendant:
Lorain County Job and Family Service, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services Bureau of State Hearings, Jennifer Roseback and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Bektas v. Lorain County Job and Family Service et al
as 1:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Haydar Bektas
Defendant:
Lorain County Job and Family Service, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services Bureau of State Hearings, Jennifer Roseback and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
C. Norris Manufacturing, LLC v. BRT Heavy Equipment, LLC
as 5:2015cv01497
Plaintiff:
C. Norris Manufacturing, LLC
Defendant:
BRT Heavy Equipment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRT Heavy Equipment, LLC v. C. Norris Manufacturing, LLC
as 5:2015cv00748
Plaintiff:
BRT Heavy Equipment, LLC
Defendant:
C. Norris Manufacturing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C. Norris Manufacturing, LLC v. BRT Heavy Equipment, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv02797
Plaintiff:
C. Norris Manufacturing, LLC
Defendant:
BRT Heavy Equipment, LLC and Beelman River Terminals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acuity v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 5:2014cv00563
Plaintiff:
Acuity
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company , Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company , Accurate Architectural Products and others
Cross_defendant:
Accurate Architectural Products, Alcoa Commercial Windows LLC , Ed Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. et al v. Catlett Quality Plumbing & Heating, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. and CHK Utica, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Catlett Quality Plumbing & Heating, Inc. , Schmuck Farms, LLC , Mark S. Addis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
