Cases 111 - 120 of 10,589
Little v. Watson et al.
as 3:2024cv01107
Defendant:
Warden Tom Watson and Correctional Officer John Doe
Plaintiff:
Matthew Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. USA
as 5:2024cv01111
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Justin D. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Watson v. USA
as 5:2024cv01105
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Kaleb Asa Love Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stroup v. Davis
as 1:2024cv01073
Petitioner:
Ryan Stroup
Respondent:
Warden Cindy Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davison v. City of Lorain et al.
as 1:2024cv01076
Defendant:
Lakeview Complex LLC, City of Lorain, City of Elyria and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dotson v. May
as 1:2024cv01081
Petitioner:
David L. Dotson
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nash v. USA
as 5:2024cv01074
Petitioner:
Khalil Nash
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bryant v. USA
as 1:2024cv01044
Petitioner:
Franklin M. Bryant
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rose v. May
as 1:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
John R. Rose
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbert v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al.
as 1:2024cv01038
Defendant:
Warden Kenntheh Black, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Auto-Cad Teacher Lisa Poff and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dean Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
