Cases 11 - 20 of 103
Cox v. United States
as 4:2023cv01329
Petitioner:
Andrew Cox
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Meek v. USA
as 4:2023cv00865
Petitioner:
Andrew Allen Meek
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Banks v. City of East Cleveland et al
as 1:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Robert Banks, Jr.
Defendant:
City of East Cleveland and Officer Andrew Majercik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown v. Kline et al
as 4:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Brown
Defendant:
Dr. James Kline, Dr. Andrew D. Eddy and Karen Stanforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Garnow v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Ryan Garnow
Defendant:
Sergeant Andrew Jones, Sergeant Devon Phillips, Correctional Officer T. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Samuel Hango v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 3:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Andrew Samuel Hango
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Warden, Ohio Unknown Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffiths v. Garza
as 4:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
Andrew Griffiths
Respondent:
Warden Fernando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Criswell v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 3:2022cv01784
Plaintiff:
Desmond Criswell
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Dr. Andrew Eddy, Warden Harold May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. United States
as 4:2022cv00166
Petitioner:
Andrew Cox
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Andrews v. State of Ohio
as 5:2021cv01755
Petitioner:
Wayne Andrews, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
