Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Jones v. USA
as 5:2015cv00893
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Brandon Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mace v. USA
as 5:2014cv02602
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Brandon R Mace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. Sears Dept Store Midway Mall et al
as 1:2013cv00821
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Davis
Defendant:
Sears Dept Store Midway Mall, Lisa Lockgraves, Edward Zeleski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Lucas County, et al
as 3:2012cv03103
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Robinson
Defendant:
Lucas County , James Telb , Milan Voska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Coakley
as 4:2012cv02573
Petitioner:
Brandon Arvel Sherman
Respondent:
J. Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Welch et al v. United States et al
as 1:2012cv02238
Plaintiff:
Edward Welch, John Roosevelt Baccus, Patrick Strozier and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Benita Y. Pearson, Thomas J. McAvoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferrell v. North Central Correctional Institution
as 1:2012cv00995
Petitioner:
Brandon Ferrell
Respondent:
North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson v. State of Ohio
as 5:2011cv00997
Petitioner:
Brandon Christopher Patterson
Respondent:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 4:2009cv02597
Petitioner:
Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 4:2009cv02566
Petitioner:
Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
