Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ladd v. USA
as 1:2024cv00701
Petitioner:
Brad R. Ladd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dover v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Domenic Dover
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, Armond Budish, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bradley v. USA
as 5:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Brad Lewis Bradley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tingler v. York et al
as 3:2022cv01170
Plaintiff:
Charles Tingler
Defendant:
Brad York, Stephen Levorchick, James VanEerten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tingler v. Levorchick et al
as 3:2022cv01131
Plaintiff:
Charles Tingler
Defendant:
Stephen Levorchick, Brad York, Kent Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. USA
as 5:2021cv01973
Petitioner:
Brad Lewis Bradley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dover v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, et al
as 1:2021cv01560
Plaintiff:
Domenic Dover
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, Armond Budish, Earl Leiken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. United States of America et al
as 4:2020cv02363
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal, Warden Michael Phillips, United States of America and others
Petitioner:
Karl L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. Trinity Services Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02465
Plaintiff:
Aaron E Young
Defendant:
Brad Smith and Trinity Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Webster County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv02695
Plaintiff:
Mark Jackson, II
Defendant:
Webster County Jail, Brad Conway and Correctional Officer Durbin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
