Cases 1 - 10 of 47
King v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garland v. Mason et al.
as 4:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Jason Milford Garland
Defendant:
Major Daniel Mason, Chaplin Tom and Sergeant Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Terrez L. Carter
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fenderson v. Management & Training Corp. et al.
as 3:2023cv02119
Plaintiff:
Tayke Fenderson
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp., Warden Tom Watson, Daniel Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilkes v. Watson
as 5:2023cv01773
Petitioner:
Joseph Wilkes
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lask v. Watson
as 3:2023cv01381
Petitioner:
Richard Lask
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Criswell v. Cutwright et al
as 1:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Criswell
Defendant:
Sergeant Tom Cutwright, Sarah Hoover and Bentleyville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Watson
as 3:2023cv00861
Petitioner:
James M. Howard
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen v. Watson
as 5:2023cv00407
Petitioner:
Robert Bowen
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Watson
as 3:2022cv02227
Petitioner:
Michael Martinez and Nicholas Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
